Lennart Nachtigall
Lennart Nachtigall
@urfeex as @mouwe5 unfortunately didn't provide any feedback if adding a `projection_evaluator` helped perhaps it would make sense to add a box constrained example and see if it makes a...
Who ever wants to test the patch on iron. I cherry picked it on iron in this fork: https://github.com/firesurfer/rclpy/tree/iron Btw. from our tests today it seems to work fine on...
Anything missing to get this finally merged @fujitatomoya and @apockill ? Would be nice not having to run a custom fork of rclpy with this patch on industrial machines.
@RobertWilbrandt might want to review this patch ?
@fmauch and @RobertWilbrandt ?
And again @fmauch and @RobertWilbrandt
Hi @fmauch I think the only thing we have to agree on is: What does a violated goal time mean if we scale down the trajectory execution. From my point...
Given that we use this patch in combination with #883 for multiple months now in our setup I think it is safe to merge :)
@fmauch So whats the state with this PR? I saw in the ros2_control wg meeting document that you plan on upstreaming this controller rather sooner than later. From my point...
A friendly ping @fmauch :)