Jon Atack

> Are you still working on this? Yes, sorry not to have seen this comment and replied. There is valuable review feedback here so it may be helpful to re-open...

Closing temporarily so that I can re-open it -- am still interested to work on this.

Now running since 2 1l2 days, taking > 1 gb of RAM, and it's slowed to a crawl of < 10 executions per minute and still has not found the...

@MarcoFalke thanks, and good idea to verify the clang version. I've been using: ``` $ clang --version clang version 6.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_600/final) Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Thread model: posix InstalledDir: /usr/local/bin ``` Which...

> I've been using Ubuntu Focal clang-9: > > ``` > $ clang --version > clang version 9.0.1-6build1 > Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu > ``` > > Also, clang-8 on Fedora 30....

Debian / Clang 6: Reproduced the crash with the CVE fix removed and @fanquake's first crasher: ``` $ src/test/fuzz/utxo_total_supply crash-9c947d9ff00fa36eca41ad27d337743fd5fee54b INFO: Seed: 38327181 INFO: Loaded 1 modules (511594 inline 8-bit...

Stopping it for now after 12 hours, CPUs running at 100%, here is the bottom of one of the log files: ``` #11181 REDUCE cov: 48212 ft: 257522 corp: 1449/3276Kb...

Thanks, will give it another good run with those suggestions.

Thanks for reviewing @RandyMcMillan. It isn't part of the changes here but happy to if I have to repush. Edit: done.

Rebased per `git range-diff 7003b6a 732fafc 7785095` and took suggestion in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24150#issuecomment-1036954660. Invalidates previous ACKs by @PastaPastaPasta and @RandyMcMillan; mind re-ACKing?