Jack O'Quin
Jack O'Quin
Knowing that it affects nodes, too, is helpful. Is it possible to get a backtrace of that failure, as well?
Sounds plausible, I'll take look at it. Thanks for doing all this work!
Wiki page [road map](http://wiki.ros.org/camera1394#Road_Map) updated to mention new Indigo features.
If I remember correctly, the `frame_rate` has no effect when Format7 is selected. That is not explained clearly in the documentation, which should be improved. Does it work with your...
While many older drivers still use the "camera" namespace, the camera prefix is not recommended practice any longer. See: [REP-0135](http://www.ros.org/reps/rep-0135.html). That REP clearly deprecates adding an "extra" level of namespace...
I don't know, haven't used this driver. Removing the extra namespace would at least follow recommended practice, but it's tricky to do that correctly. Either way, the compatibility issue seriously...
Good idea. That's probably a reasonable solution for deprecation in Indigo, with removal in J-turtle. I would not recommend changing Hydro. I assume this driver is fairly widely used.
It's not for me to say. You are one of the maintainers. It looks OK to me. Since you asked: :smile: - I would only issue the deprecation warning once...
Seems like a good idea. The driver could publish dropped frame information to the /diagnostics topic. Testing could be tricky. Maybe we could add a specific hz_rate parameter for unit...
To which ROS versions should this apply? Which are not compatible?