Jack O'Quin
Jack O'Quin
My personal experience with Ackermann navigation is limited to a single no-longer-operational vehicle. From [reviews and discussions](http://wiki.ros.org/Ackermann%20Group/January%2029%2C%202012) conducted by the [ROS Ackermann Group](http://wiki.ros.org/Ackermann%20Group), I believe the [ackermann_msgs](http://wiki.ros.org/ackermann_msgs) definitions are sufficiently...
Is there a difference between **omnidirectional** and **holonomic**? I think ROS navigation already handles that for PR2 support.
Combining the messages in a single repo forces them to always be released together, with the same version numbers. Given the stability of ``ackermann_msgs``, I don't see much advantage to...
Seems like a good idea to me, but I probably don't understand all the implications. For a long time I have wanted to be able to define a workspace environment...
Beginners have a lot of trouble setting up their environment correctly. Even experienced people are unsure whether to source /opt/ros/... as well as their workspace. IIUC, the answer is "no",...
+1 to minimal dependencies
+1 from me, also, @tkruse
Catkin build has already been helpful for me. I work on so many diverse packages, that I find myself with eight or ten catkin_make workspaces, a big time waster. They...
I really like catkin_tools and use it a lot. But, having to re-source every time I add a package to a workspace is one of the few annoying usability problems...
That sounds great, Jon. I was not aware of "linked-devel" configuration. Is that an option of the config verb?