Val Wood

I still think we should remove NMS complex. It isn't a complex as such and was defined based on other. characteristics. PMID: 17035632 " We found that the 22 mitotic...

Thanks @raymond91125 This will be cleaner and reflects the biology better.

11 EXP annotations, can we go ahead and obsolete. That will remove this particular problem @pgaudet

(the other 7000 annotation all appear to be from ARBA)

I thought (was hoping) that this ticket would fix the issue we describe here: https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/23012 but it didn't. Was it supposed to? @balhoff @cmungall CC @kimrutherford We still have an...

@kimrutherford ?

Here was one example. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/term/GO:0071963 So it's a different term but the same reason I think. At least the problem was traced t logical definitions coming from Uberon in https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/23012

Also https://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/term/GO:0051523 https://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/term/GO:0060624 https://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/term/GO:0061246

I still think it is something to do with this. See comment from @balhoff here: https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/21217#issuecomment-1066785858 - I never could see the taxon constraints .

GO:0097690 iron ion transmembrane transporter inhibitor activity should move under this term too. (Or if the term is 'lipid transported inhibitor as in the header, a parent term for the...