Val Wood

Thanks @deustp01 "reactive oxygen species biosynthetic process" and its descendants including regulation has 142 EXP annotations (109 metazoan, 33 plant, 1 fungi) Unless any evidence of biosynthesis I suggest we...

OK! I still think maybe we could lose the grouping term "reactive oxygen species biosynthetic process"?

This was on my list.

I had to look them up every time ;)

On the next call can we discuss which complexes should be annotated to each of these terms? For example SWR-C, I have annotated to chromatin remodelling, I am not sure...

Also since 'GO:0140673 co-transcriptional chromatin reassembly' is a descendant of "elongation" will GO:0045815 be made a child of "initiation"? and should the "regulation of..." ancestry be removed?

GO:0140673 'transcriptional elongation-coupled chromatin remodeling I'm still confused by this ;) The annotations to include things like GO:0140673 'transcriptional elongation-coupled chromatin remodeling' SPBC21C3.16c | spt4 | DSIF transcription elongation factor...

Maybe we shouldn't still be describing spt5 and spt6 as "elongation factors". This is the problem with these "factor "terms in the MF ontology, they aren't precisely defined for process...

Good point... A sibling term has negative regulation of gene expression, epigenetic so would transcription initiation-coupled chromatin remodeling, epigenetic be appropriate?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1472303/ I think they might be the same thing. However the term should refer to 3' end processing, NOT maturation. If this does turn out to be the case I...