Peter Barker

On Mon, 12 Oct 2020, Peter Hall wrote: > @peterbarker The longer term goal of this is to be able to define > pathways to get from one fence area...

... you could also just use a mission command to disable the fence between inclusion zones and re-enable it when you're in the next. I'm really not sure of the...

@rmackay9 sorry, premises weren't clear. I was just musing on the fact that transiting without a fence is odd. Assumed premise was that these fences were sometimes "or"

On Tue, 13 Oct 2020, James O wrote: > The logic becomes: Am I inside at least one inclusion fence rather than Am I inside _ALL_ inclusion fences. There's a...

On Tue, 13 Oct 2020, James O wrote: > Perhaps another way to ask is, when would you use multiple polygons overlapped that you couldn't/wouldn't just use a simple polygon....

On Sun, 18 Oct 2020, Peter Hall wrote: > @peterbarker I have been playing with fences some more. In master we don't > actually support this. Loading a new fence...

> Can we hold off on this until we see the larger change to allow setting home before the origin? I agree that the two don't need to be linked...

Maybe `s/in_rc_failsafe/in_failsafe/`

> want me to SITL and bench test this? and close mine? Yes please!

On Fri, 8 Jan 2021, Pierre Kancir wrote: > looks like we can merge the two cases Read a little harder. They *look* very similar :-)