necessarily-equal
necessarily-equal
This may also be solved by caping text length
Removed from milestone because everything but « Add support for transforms. » has been ticked, and we don't need that for 0.53
This is one of the case where both options feel equally good to me, and could equally get a bug report to change the default. ### Pros for voting by...
Note that if we start making votes anouncement big and shiny, we risk having people complaining they lost because of that. I've seen such complaints already. This question is another...
Maybe allowing to change it twice (allowing to go back to your original choice) would be better though.
I really don't like the idea of making number of votes configurable on the admin, it would make it really confusing for the user. You really don't want the user...
I've sneaked in some more commit without touching the previous ones, let me know if that's bad style :eyes:
I've merged the first 3 commits manually so this can be about nitpicking the spectator thing. I still think the current code is fine :)