Jon Atack comments

Results 455 comments of


                                            Jon Atack

BIP 181, 182, 183: BIPs for Utreexo

@kcalvinalvin there doesn't seem to be any response since late August -- do you plan to address the review and update here?

BIP153: SENDTEMPLATE

> Post to bitcoindev group hasn't made it through fixed, published

BIP 89: Chain Code Delegation for Private Collaborative Custody

Thanks for updating. > Final verdict: 95 % LLM-generated or LLM-heavy, with ~5 % human origination of the core idea and final review. @jurvis can you help me out, please:...

BIP 89: Chain Code Delegation for Private Collaborative Custody

> hi @jonatack, happy to help. does the scan run through the sample code as well? Gave it the BIP draft only.

Expand BIP85 to include ECC key types

Hi @3rdIteration, mind addressing the remaining feedback here? Edit: per https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1967#discussion_r2411869941, when in doubt might be most prudent to go with option c?

Expand BIP85 to include ECC key types

> Are there any that aren't addressed? (In terms of the other PR, I agree that option C makes the most sense) @3rdIteration the changelog update, not sure for the...

Expand BIP85 to include ECC key types

#1967 has been merged, so this can now be rebased to master and the changelog updated.

Use git worktree in diffcheck.sh to avoid mutating the working tree

Also, note that this change did not pass CI. Putting this into draft until it does.

Use git worktree in diffcheck.sh to avoid mutating the working tree

@viktorking7, this is still not passing CI. There is a similar, already existing proposal in #1924 -- would you mind reviewing it, please?

Caution on tweaking in bip 327

cc BIP authors @jonasnick @real-or-random @robot-dreams for feedback