Jon Atack
Jon Atack
Yes, it's the discrepancy with the "FSFAP" license headers in those BIPs that gave me pause. Maybe write "GNU All-Permissive License (editor note: equivalent to FSF All-Permissive License)" -- if...
This is an excellent suggestion. Network redundancy is valuable. Both the Tor and I2P networks have seen sustained attacks, and the recent one against I2P pretty much took it down...
Thanks @kanzure. No strong opinion, but I think I mildly prefer the destination urls over the redirects.
In this context, concept ack with waiting for a more general solution rather than iterative piecemeal changes, as long as achieving it (via cluster mempool) looks reasonably attainable.
Concept ACK Would need a release note?
Concept ACK on potentially adjusting peers based on their resource usage, though the devil may be in the details. If I'm not misremembering, this has been brought up as an...
> Currently, about 7% of my IPv4/IPv6 addrman entries use non 8333 port. Same (8% of IPv6, 2% of IPv6, 7% overall)
cc BIP author @BitcoinErrorLog for approval/feedback
I generally say "bitcoin" instead of "bitcoins". That said, the other BIPs and the user-facing documentation in Bitcoin Core (RPC/CLI/GUI) use the word "bitcoins" to indicate more than one bitcoin...
Tend to NACK if not explicit, as it contradicts current convention in the BIPs and Bitcoin Core and for the reason in https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1856#discussion_r2102435374.