Jon Atack
Jon Atack
@BitcoinErrorLog @moneyball any further thoughts following the above feedback?
> "This BIP adopts the convention of treating "bitcoin" as an uncountable noun." > which should avoid Jon's concern about ppl trying to correct the grammar. ACK, this is what...
LGTM > we must resolve the topic of which convention to apply in this BIP @BitcoinErrorLog your call yay or nay here
Friendly ping to @BitcoinErrorLog for decision.
@BitcoinErrorLog friendly ping for your decision here.
cc BIP author @prusnak
ACK b0125501f824804dc5f39f143c3c674f3eac6c7f For context, this change was recommended yesterday in https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1600#issuecomment-2394691135. BIP author @ethankosakovsky has been unresponsive for a long time but would be good to see community feedback here.
Waiting for #1679 outcome before merge here.
Hi @QbitsCode, can you please add the link to the mailing list discussion of this proposal to your pull request description? (I took a quick look in the mailing list...
> Although the BIP is still in Draft status, I think it should have been marked as proposed or final a long time ago as it does appear to be...