Jon Atack

@cryptoquick Can you begin to write up the sections currently marked as TBD, along with a backwards compatibility section (to describe incompatibilities, severity, and suggest mitigations, where applicable/relevant)? We've begun...

@cryptoquick ping for an update here. Have you seen https://groups.google.com/g/bitcoindev/c/p8xz08YTvkw / https://github.com/chucrut/bips/blob/master/bip-xxxx.md? It may be interesting to review each other and possibly collaborate.

> @jonatack Why did you re-add the draft designation? From what I understand, @murchandamus recommended that be changed: [#1670 (comment)](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1670#issuecomment-2523737288) I see. The PR title doesn't refer to the GitHub...

I have a range of numbers in mind for QC resistance BIPs to run by the other editors and am re-reviewing here.

This BIP refers to BIP41, The Stratum mining protocol, for which a BIP number was assigned and an entry exists in the README, but there doesn't seem to be pull...

@ben221199 This draft might be missing the following: - [ ] Backwards compatibility section describing incompatibilities, severity, and suggest mitigations - [ ] Reference implementation (necessary before status "Final", but...

> Where should I place that? They are generally the last two sections in other BIPs.

> I'm planning to resume working on this in Q2. Hi @ben221199, are you still working on this BIP draft?

> When I have a list of erratas and suggestions ready to submit, what should be the process, like I’m opening a pull request for review ? Hi @ariard, yes,...

Thanks for the update. Converted to draft -- please ping here when ready for review.