Ian
Ian
Yeah, I think a FAQ is fine... I wrote that before I saw your comment above.
So, FHIR Observations have a `category` property that tries to cover "what kind" of observation that they are. In OMRS, the same concept is usually represented by "concept class" for...
I still need to move the actual logic into the FHIR2 module, so this remains pending.
> Certainly if we can all agree on a set of behaviors then it doesn't need to be configurable. I think there are fewer headaches if it's not configurable and...
Looks like this is still necessary (i.e., we're skipping this test on GH Actions).
@kalai-tw Could you rebase this branch on master, since we've committed the fix for the test?
Hmmm... I'd prefer a fix for this that didn't rely on extending `BaseModuleContextSensitiveTest` as that brings in a bunch of cruft. It may be that the test here or the...
Alternative fix that addresses the issue of at least that particular test sequence: https://github.com/openmrs/openmrs-module-fhir2/pull/538
PS I think the handling of the `_has` parameter should look something like this: ```java private void handleHasAndParam(Criteria criteria, HasAndListParam hasAndListParam) { if (hasAndListParam == null) { return; } DetachedCriteria...
@theanandankit I don't want to discourage you and thanks for your work on this, but the real challenge here is figuring out how to map a FHIR relationship back into...