Eric Deutsch
Eric Deutsch
Hi everyone, I have committed some adjustments to the QueryGraphInterpreter that I hope will do what we want. I opted for a very light touch at first to see how...
So I tried a full test in devED: https://arax.ncats.io/devED/ pasting in the above query graph, and I see this: ``` ... 2024-10-09T21:51:41.549822 INFO: QueryGraphInterpreter recognized query_graph as a 'pathfinder' query:...
I don't think I really understand the question. I think it is a given that queries will come in via the query_graph like in the middle of this thread, e.g.:...
So here's my thoughts on what connect() should be doing in this scenario: - Examine the input query_graph as given to it to identify what are the two pinned nodes....
AH, I get it now, sorry. Yes, I think using the DSL to build a query graph that mirrors what would come from the ARS seems easiest. One snag could...
no problem. Your note was actually clear enough in the first place. I just misread it/misunderstood it.
hmm, I'm vaguely thinking that we probably meant to set that to True after our testing and development on the centralized system? The track needs a True value here: https://github.com/RTXteam/RTX/blob/7427abd9a0960b82d365db21c44e76e04868ab84/code/ARAX/ARAXQuery/ARAX_query_tracker.py#L52...
I think this can be closed, yes.
It is my understanding that OBO-Edit has been long deprecated and not recommended for use anymore. Apparently Protege is now the recommended ontology editor tool. However, if you don't need...
Closing. Please reopen if more information is needed.