Thomas S. Binns
Thomas S. Binns
Thanks for the review @adam2392! Very good points, will have a look at implementing them by the end of the week. Cheers!
Comments should be addressed now @adam2392.
Hi @adam2392 & @larsoner, is there something you think is still missing from this I should be working on? I have some time this month if so.
Awesome! Thanks @larsoner 🚀
@GioMarraffini @Laouen Thanks both for responding to my initial suggestion so quickly. The changes with the anti-aliasing parameter look very reasonable. Unfortunately the next 2 weeks at work are super...
Rerunning the failing test; should not be a problem from your end.
Something I also didn't consider before is the size of the testing data. The existing test data is 0.9 MB, but the wSMI data is 5.3 MB. Without the wSMI...
> The problem with generating test data online is that we have no ground thruth for that data. Currently, the ground truth is the value obtained by the original function....
Hi @GioMarraffini, do you think those latest commits in a8d826350fb34c56acdff57acb5056d8cb355707 are ready for another round of reviews?
@larsoner and @drammock, please can I ask one of you to check through this. All previous comments pending these very minor recent ones have been addressed. The new function is...