Steve Howell
Steve Howell
We haven't found anybody who wants to actively maintain this project. I think most Zulip users have found other solutions for bots.
The first two commits here should be no-brainers to merge (just node test cleanup). And the third can probably also be merged (since no comments on it).
(rebased off of latest master)
This is a good idea, and similar ideas have been suggested before. One way to solve the tagging problem is to have somebody implement a bot that watches for tags,...
We don't really maintain many bots yet, but I'm hoping to improve that shortly, and once we some momentum on that front, I'll add some documentation. Until then you can...
I still think we should do a bot for this. I'll mention it on the integration stream.
I keep trying to persuade folks not to use the threaded approach, but it's probably worth somebody trying it to prove me wrong, and if I'm wrong, so be it....
@iishiishii Thanks for working on this and cleaning up your commit message. We generally frown on directly calling view functions. You can see this in the current `EmbettedBotHandler` code--for example,...
I guess one of the tricky things here is that we do a lot of stuff in the view function that really belongs more in a library function, such as...
Chat discussion: https://chat.zulip.org/#narrow/stream/9-issues/topic/.23P566.20ExternalBotHandler.3A.20support.20reactions/near/871627