Ryan Knox
Ryan Knox
I think this PR is close to ready. Recent changes: 1) I merge it up to master 2) expanded test coverage per recommendations of SE team about 3 weeks ago...
Below is the test fail list as of f427877. Note that most of these are either expected, or simply missing bases since the tests are new. The only test fail...
@peterdschwartz , thanks for working through this with us. I like automatically generating changes to the parameter file, or at least having it scripted, because it removes the human error...
My take is that this calculation should be avoided on fates columns and patches since its not relevant or used, perhaps bounding it inside a use_fates or a patch level...
@glemieux can you take a look at PR #7542 and close this if/when you deem appropriate?
I think the proposed solution makes sense @mvertens
I'm not sure, we plan to cover this topic in a developer meeting when we have a quorum
This is passing fates test suit on derecho, B4B with base
@ekluzek , the python scripts for fates parameter file modifications, including $FATESDIR/tools/modify_fates_paramfile.py, just use the core libraries now. Derecho had no trouble with modify_fates_paramfile.py. Lets see how izumi does..
Thanks for running those tests @ekluzek , I'll take a look