Ryan Knox
@ekluzek I don't have a good sense of how the dry-dep scheme works, but I'm keeping my eye on this issue. @ekluzek, I and others may team up and look...
land developer tests on cori pass: /global/cscratch1/sd/rgknox/e3sm_tests/E2ba9fa8333-Fdef6b3e7-fates-api24-v2 All fates tests have expected NLCOMP and BASELINE differences All non-fates tests are B4B with base with some timing differences which I believe...
Thanks for comments @bishtgautam , I think I've addressed them
I can. This module is in progress in FATES, we do plan on having a test for it.
@bishtgautam , removed the damage test defs
ok, thanks for bringing this up @jayeshkrishna
@jinyun1tang , regarding the value that is passed to betr, is it supposed to be the maximum possible number of patches on a column, or something else? Further, which LU's...
In that case, I _think_ natpft_size is what I would pass in to betr then. If you started to run it on the crop LU as well, then the maximum...
@adrifoster, my understanding (and the intent of recent PR https://github.com/ESCOMP/CTSM/pull/1766), was that FATES should not fail anymore when using expanded CROP surface datasets. The only issue is that if we...
@ckoven I think it depends on how we implement this. But like you say, the ELM and CLM surface datasets are all different, so the mapping we have in our...