Ryan Knox
For any given column, we seem to be operating with our 1600 cohorts each requiring their own photosynthesis calculations, a scheme which is embedded in the canflux iterative solve. So...
For accuracy's sake, I just want to point out that we actually perform photosynthesis on each leaf-layer of each canopy-layer, and since we use PPA, each pft has its own...
There is also this old issue here: https://github.com/NGEET/fates/issues/386
@ekluzek fates thus far has been coupled in such a way to not allow coexistance with crops. This choice was for simplicity. Part of this reason is because we have...
@ekluzek , following our conversation, I worked more on the ability of FATES to dictate natural-veg patch counts, via: https://github.com/ESCOMP/CTSM/pull/1766 I think with that PR, it should be no problem...
In my PR I'm assuming that irrigation and fertilizer is turned off, the datasets can't be used with fates. That could be a future stretch goal.
I took a look at our fates folder to see if we are doing the same thing. We are kinda imposing the Fates prefix. About 50%-ish of the time we...
I agree, there should be no refactoring necessary on the FATES side. I would expect the compset would generate the use_fates_sp setting, and that would continue to be passed in...
I'm working through updating the interface with fates to accomodate nutrient dynamics between the two. I think it would be helpful if the patch and column soil filters were partitioned...
I'll hold on making any changes, and will check-in during the Thursday SE meeting to see where we are on it.