Mike Drob
Mike Drob
> If so, this is the kind of thing we'd ideally test via Docker; a real integration test Or BATS. https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/solr/packaging/test/test_modules.bats#L35
I remember rubbing into this with @markrmiller i think we left a comment in the security policy about it?
I'm not able to reproduce the failure seen by the GitHub actions, can somebody help me figure out if this is caused by my changes or an existing issue?
Force pushed rebase to development branch.
Hi @bvalyou, can you highlight the benefits of submitting Pkl to the CNCF? AFAIU, Helm integration should be doable without it, if that's the main concern?
Glad I checked the existing PRs - I was going to make this same suggestion! @kutsal - One implementation suggestion... Maybe have two separate methods? One that takes `(key,value)` and...
Yea, we can't have hard timeouts because if this gets run on CI servers that can be a huge range of hardware, and if it gets run on cloud hosts...
Would this be better in test-framework as a stub? My goals here are to always have something that I can run against master without needing to recreate this class every...
> Test-framework as a stub makes sense I tried making this work, but it got really messy because I started having to move the configset over modules and rearranging much...
@piuma Are there similar changes that we can should make for the windows side of things?