Robert Findley

This came up during the tools call. If we can come up with a natural API that allows for future extension, I think we could add this for 1.23 or...

May be a real flake, or transient network failure. Moving to next release milestone.

Thanks for the feature request. I agree that this could be a useful refactoring operation, and is certainly doable. It's also useful for more than just testing.

If this proposal were accepted, would the following code be valid? ```go type A[T any] int type B[U comparable] = A[U] ``` I.e. would it be possible to define an...

@bcmills > Note that we do allow function value assignment to strengthen (but not weaken) a type via assignability, which IMO is analogous to strengthening type constraints on a type...

@bcmills > Sure, but pretty much the entire point of type parameters is to support variance in types. 😉 FWIW, I don't follow this argument. We still support variance in...

I think the case for this notice being useful here is slim -- the example you suggest would be better handled by some sort of search for inexhaustive type switches....

This looks like a dupe of golang/go#57081. Earlier versions of the extension would actually get confused and send incorrect edits in this case (because they did not correlated the two...

Hi, thanks for the report. Could you please share the output of `gopls version`? Can you please also share the log you see in the gopls output channel and tell...

Can you please share the output of `gopls version`?