Chenna Keshava B S
Chenna Keshava B S
It is the consensus of Javascript developers to not enforce type-restrictions on the numeric inputs. This behavior appears to be well-understood in the Javascript community. I'll close this PR.
@interc0der I'm able to run the below snippet without the typescript compiler throwing any warnings (or) errors. It looks like type manipulation is possible in the current version of the...
> Omit type utility is the one that is the problem. While this is not breaking the ts compiler, you are losing type safety. Okay, I found this snippet which...
@interc0der can you add some unit tests which prove the correctness of the `Omit` types with your code changes?
@interc0der Clarification: Are you trying to remove the `[x: string]: unknown` key-value pair from the `BaseRequest` ? I'm looking at the work-around that you suggested here: > ``` type RemoveIndexSignature...
@interc0der Hello, did you get a chance to go through my comments?
Hello @interc0der , can you address my pending comments above?
I'd like to close this PR. Please look at my comments and let me know if you would like to address/refute them. The PR can be re-opened at an appropriate...
On a similar note, the `jest-enzyme` package makes use of `micromatch` dependency. However, there is a Regular Expression DoS associated with `micromatch`: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-952p-6rrq-rcjv. The secure version is `[email protected]`. I cannot...
Okay. Would it be correct to assume that any untrusted user input is not relevant to the jest-enzyme package? Since it's used in a test environment?