chrchr-github
chrchr-github
Just stating the fact is probably not enough to steer users in the right direction. And if 'pass by value + move' is used, the object will still be passed...
> > So maybe we should just mention the alternatives ('const ref', 'pass by value + move', 'universal ref'?). > > stupid question; what do you mean with 'universal ref'?...
Could be that `simplifyTypedefCpp()` is a misnomer and actually needs to run for C code as well... @danmar
Can you add a test in `qt.cpp`?
I guess the point is that the function that calls `va_start` (`check_noret_va_end()`) doesn't return, since it calls a noreturn function.
Blocked by https://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/13010
I guess it was intended to allow developers to check their code without having the `CHECK_INTERNAL` flag set. But the CI does that anyway. @orbitcowboy Do you actually use this...
So I would say we should get rid of it.
`var->valueType()->pointer` should be 2 in this case.
`long long` is still being used in some places.