chrchr-github
chrchr-github
> Sorry for going off-topic but we really need to take a strong look at this check. We currently do not apply these findings to our code and if we...
> > That could just be the ugly std::transform ones though > > Whats the problem with `std::transform`? ~~~ for (auto& i : v) i += 5; ~~~ vs. ~~~...
C++20 improves things a little: ~~~ bool f(const std::vector& v) { return std::ranges::any_of(v, [](const auto& s) { return s.empty(); }); } ~~~
But this PR is still about flagging iterators, which also make for unreadable code.
Any more feedback on this?
So I made this mergeable once more. How about it?
On the topic of parentheses, not sure if this is related: The token list currently does not contain the double parentheses in `foo((x = 1, x = x + 1));`...
This still requires approval.
Make noise until @danmar notices it? 😜
Let's mention @danmar again...