Jean Boussier
Jean Boussier
uh, somehow I was convinced I had merged this.
I just released 4.2.2
This PR doesn't need merged. The fix is already merged, all is needed is a release. You can confirm that by using the gem as a git repo: ```ruby gem...
The process to get this sort of features discussed is to add the ticket to the next developer meeting: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21689 Have you done that already? That being said, it's mostly...
> wasn't aware of the process, already added. I'd recommend including a bit more of the high level justifications in your bullet points.
@segiddins sorry for the lack of response, I barely had a minute these last two weeks. I'm not very familiar with bundler/rubygems codebase, so can't comment on the implementation, but...
> and the Rails team insist you fix it FYI, we don't *insist* anything and this sort of phrasing isn't a good way to get project maintainers help.
> I don't care how my words land, Well you should, because I was very close to just ignore you on the other issue because of your tone. And I...
IMO this is welcome because that will get rid of quite a bit of dependencies in the rails Gemfile. However before creating `activejob-*` gems, it would probably be worth reaching...
Is there really a rush? While as I said I'd love to reduce the dependencies needed to contribute to Rails, these doesn't appear actively harmful currently. So I don't really...