Thomas Beutlich

> > > Sorry, I am not good enough in github to understand the current status: Is the request from Thomas (update of release notes) included in the pull request?...

If milestone [MSL4.0.1](https://github.com/modelica/ModelicaStandardLibrary/milestone/62) was closed (w/o releasing/tagging anything), then also [MSL3.2.3+maint](https://github.com/modelica/ModelicaStandardLibrary/milestone/59) should be closed. Basically @casella dropped the maintenance promise we aligned some years ago. > @HansOlsson @casella, this is...

No more need to keep this PR and [MSL3.2.3+maint](https://github.com/modelica/ModelicaStandardLibrary/milestone/59) open.

Resolved by #4429 and backported by #4437.

Yes, that's why it's labeled [`requires Modelica 3.7`](https://github.com/modelica/ModelicaStandardLibrary/labels/requires%20Modelica%203.7).

> What I mean is that a development version (of Spec) is not a release and can still change. Maybe unlikely for the _License_ annotation but who knows. This just...

@casella Feel free to update the milestone if this is not yet considered for MSL 4.1.0. I didn't want to miss the opportunity though what's possible with new MoLang 3.6.

> BTW: Dymola 2024x can generate such templates with > `generateTranslationFile("Modelica", "Modelica.pot");` Nice! When opening the generated POT file in Poedit translation tool I get a warning on duplicate items:...

> > BTW: Dymola 2024x can generate such templates with > > `generateTranslationFile("Modelica", "Modelica.pot");` > > And there's some way of reading them as well and (partially) using them -...

> @sjoelund I don't understand why C-Sources cannot be built for something that didn't change them. CI environments are variant systems themselves.