Thomas Beutlich

I understand your trouble. It simply does not look mature when checking the model results. 

This is related to https://github.com/modelica/ModelicaStandardLibrary/issues/671.

Not feasible for MSL v4.0.0 -> removing milestone.

@rfranke Modelica.Fluid.Interfaces.PartialPressureLoss uses the names `d_a`, `d_b`, `eta_a` and `eta_b`. Same idents are also used in Modelica.Fluid.Fittings.BaseClasses.Bends.CurvedBend.{massFlowRate, pressureLoss}, Modelica.Fluid.Fittings.BaseClasses.Bends.EdgedBend.{massFlowRate, pressureLoss} and Modelica.Fluid.Fittings.BaseClasses.Orifices.ThickEdgedOrifice.{massFlowRate, pressureLoss} as function arguments. Shall they be renamed...

No reply from library officers -> removing milestone.

Point to @ceraolo.

Point to @ceraolo.

> I don't know if significant enough to push for release. For me it seems like a MSL bug. What's the opinion of the Media officers?

Unfortunately, the new test model ModelicaTest.Media.TestOnly.R134a_setState_phX raises a [AssignmentFromNonDiscreteToDiscrete](https://doc.simulationx.com/4.4/1033/Content/FAQ/Troubleshooting/ErrorsAndWarnings.htm#Modelica.AssignmentFromNonDiscreteToDiscrete) warning in SimulationX 4.4 and fails to simulate with all tested solvers due to a singular system of equations. It does...

As a very quick response: Did you have a look at [Modelica.Mechanics.Translational.Examples.GenerationOfFMUs](https://doc.modelica.org/Modelica%204.0.0/Resources/helpDymola/Modelica_Mechanics_Translational_Examples.html#Modelica.Mechanics.Translational.Examples.GenerationOfFMUs)?