Thomas Beutlich
Thomas Beutlich
> If that is hidden in a function you can be sure that any modification of the external object is intended to be lost. Does Dymola call the destructor directly...
Let's assume the external object construction of `MyExternalObject` takes a long time and you need to call the function `foo` many times with (different) inputs. How to optimize the simulation...
@HansOlsson I just noticed that the milestone was moved. Back to my original issue and my repeated tries to make it somehow working in Dymola. You mentioned example `foo` returning...
Citing myself from ^^ > But what the customer needs are dynamic array sizes read from file and used as parameters. It seems that Dymola 2025x users will benefit from...
> lets say of Java, C#, Python 3, Julia, C++. Or Wolfram Language.
> please back-port [#4522](https://github.com/modelica/ModelicaStandardLibrary/pull/4522) to maint/v4.1.x. Done by #4533.
@HansOlsson Is this due to #4151? @GallLeo Please add the appropriate labels for library and version.
Try https://www.ltx.de/download/MA/Compare_MSL_v4.1.0/Compare/Modelica/20240129232335/Modelica.Blocks.Examples.Noise.NormalNoiseProperties/CSVCompare/NormalNoiseProperties_report.html where the mean output error is the reason for result failure.
Yes, removing from comparison might be good approach since protected anyway.
> Possibly different random sequence for the first two. This needs some more evidence as I am not aware on RNG changes.