Thomas Beutlich

Yes, that version should match the tagged repository/book version (0.6.0), but it does not: https://github.com/mtiller/ModelicaBook/blob/6a23eb9d5aa8c1187a67ab833d20e265798a329b/ModelicaByExample/package.mo#L3

By the way, would be appreciated to migrate from the obsolete MSL version 3.2.2, too. See my other open issues #406 and #439 for it.

> Spec in HTML would be huge It is here: https://specification.modelica.org/v3.4/MLS.html But only v3.4 is available as HTML, which also would require to update the book to that version, see...

What aboout #33 then?

> > > @thorade, we're now testing the conversion of HelmholtzMedia to MSL 4.0.0, using OpenModelica. As reported [here](https://github.com/OpenModelica/OpenModelica/issues/7683#issuecomment-945647556), we are getting a large number of failures because you are...

Any comment please? Still observed in v1.183.0.

What are the direct requirements on the Python virtual environment? Is it just esbonio? ``` esbonio==0.10.0 ```

I'd prefer not to link to the file history of GitHub. That does no sound useful to me. For me the revision history should document relevant changes from the user's...

Can you confirm if #3700 solves the issue.

The MOS table format (i.e., of files starting with the `#1` header) is rather lenient (or error-prone as you observed it) w.r.t. row and column dimension checks. By design, only...