Jim Balhoff
Jim Balhoff
@bvarner-ebi I think this issue is subsumed by #2218.
I think it could be, maybe your solution could be applied to the other issue. Basically we just need the term to be a material structure rather than an immaterial...
I can try adding this to a test Ubergraph build to see if there are negative consequences.
I checked this group of merged ontologies with this property chain, and didn't find any unsatisfiabilities: https://github.com/INCATools/ubergraph/blob/master/ci/test-merged.ofn
> Notably, the entire -base system, as currently implemented in the ODK, is entirely relying on “base IRIs” to decide whether a given entity belongs to the base or not!...
@gouttegd yes I agree that's how it's recommended now, it's just a bit different from the original conception (which also didn't include inferences). I guess we're getting off topic for...
I added a check in #28186.
@cmungall not sure what level this needs to be: - [anatomical entity](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0001062) - [material anatomical entity](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000465) - [anatomical structure](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000061) How far down can it go?
This happens in my web application, as well as the Comunica demo page, but I can't reproduce it on the command line. On the command line, I'm seeing different behavior...