Jim Balhoff

> > renaming molecular function to "gene product or complex activity" > > Is there any real hope here? :D I proposed we rename "molecular_function" (the actual label) to "molecular...

This would be necessary if we (e.g. GO) want to import COB instead of BFO axioms.

I'm a little confused, and sorry if I haven't followed this correctly. But why can't you simply state that something is 'located in' a material entity, rather than asserting 'part...

Linked issues: - https://github.com/monarch-initiative/mondo/issues/5614 - https://github.com/HUPO-PSI/psi-mi-CV/issues/449 - https://github.com/obophenotype/biological-spatial-ontology/pull/44 - https://github.com/EnvironmentOntology/envo/issues/1380 - https://github.com/Planteome/plant-experimental-conditions-ontology/pull/131 - https://github.com/Planteome/plant-ontology/issues/714 - https://github.com/monarch-initiative/mondo/issues/5616 - https://github.com/obophenotype/mouse-anatomy-ontology/issues/124 - https://github.com/The-Sequence-Ontology/SO-Ontologies/issues/608 - https://github.com/obophenotype/mouse-anatomy-ontology/pull/125

@gouttegd in my experience Uberon and EMAPA are not really compatible when logically bridged. Has this been fixed?

Ubergraph is meant to be a logically coherent system, and the relation-graph depends on that. We could add "mapping" versions of the bridges that aren't compatible, such as `UBERON:femur skos:closeMatch...

Thanks! My main question was about whether it would be confusing to users to add more kinds of edges that have their own background semantics. For the taxon constraints I...

I'm inclined to grow this Ubergraph as large as possible, at least adding ENVO, PO, and FOODON. I know less about MIxS, but if you think it's a good idea...

@cmungall PO doesn't seem to have a base file, do you think they can make one? cc @matentzn

Same for FOODON.