aclum

@mslarae13 no, this is an aggregation table from the output of the [MetaproteomicsAnalysisActivity](https://microbiomedata.github.io/nmdc-schema/MetaproteomicsAnalysisActivity/)/ i am setting this up the same way that @turbomam created the [FunctionalAnnotationAggMember ](https://microbiomedata.github.io/nmdc-schema/FunctionalAnnotationAggMember/) class to aggregate...

@naglepuff or @marySalvi Could you comment on what fields from the metap_gene_function_aggregation collection the data portal ingest code uses? We have to change the name of best_protein since it is...

@turbomam I don't understand your 'probably unintentional' comment about the gold slots. Do you mean that the values in id and gold_study_identifiers can be the same? This will be resolved...

Okay, we need to change the name of that so just a note that this will be a minor breaking change to the data portal. best_protein will be come is_best_protein...

@mbthornton-lbl this is ready for the migration code to be written.

Migration code has been written. Ready for code review and to get merged in but I think Mark as signed off for the year so will move to 'in review'...

This task is on hold for now until such time as @SamuelPurvine and @pdpiehowski and others figure out what changes the metaproteomics workflow metadata will look like. Removing from sprint...

@turbomam do you want to work off of this ticket or #1212 , they are redundant as far as I can tell.

We need a pattern constraints on was_informed_by, has_calibration, was_generated_by, has_input, has_output

This was resolved by https://github.com/microbiomedata/nmdc-schema/pull/1994