VReaperV
VReaperV
Somebody might look at this project as if it had two heads. > Is there really some good reason to build two different client binaries? Yes, the reasons were outlined...
> Anything that affects users who did not enable Vulkan mode in any way should be subject to code review. This was addressed as well: > My condition is that...
> Where? I haven't seen any discussion of technical reasons for this. Only the organizational one of possibly making it easier to develop in a fork. Sections 1 and 3...
Thanks, that is very good. I'll do a pr for the above cmake change to avoid rebuilding both all the time, in a bit (or just push it to the...
> All the script is doing is to mirror the branches across repositories. It is just purposed to make it easy to create a pull request to merge `master-vulkan` to...
> All the script is doing is to mirror the branches across repositories. It is just purposed to make it easy to create a pull request to merge `master-vulkan` to...
`/listmaps doom` lists both `doom` and `testing/map-doom` as well (note the latter has `map-` in its name).
I did run as DLL, yeah. IIRC the reason was that `L` was nullptr, so my assumption was that Lua wasn't initialised but was still attempted to be closed.
> The obstacle code doesn't take STEPSIZE (the vertical distance you can step up without jumping) into account, so I imagine the bots think that the path to the Armoury...
> The obstacle code doesn't take STEPSIZE (the vertical distance you can step up without jumping) into account, so I imagine the bots think that the path to the Armoury...