Jesse Plamondon-Willard

**tl;dr:** I'm tentatively targeting SMAPI 3.14.0 for a fix. See below for the details and why I'm not doing it in 3.12.9 or 3.13.0. ## Problem That's a fundamental issue...

Another option might be to intercept assets one step lower as part of the content API redesign (#766), so mods could intercept `Data/Bundles.pt-BR` or `Data/Bundles`. That would be a major...

The game sets the unlocalized bundles at two points: when creating the save and when loading it. So you'd need a condition that only becomes true after the save is...

The [content API rewrite](https://github.com/Pathoschild/SMAPI/issues/766) needed to fix this is in progress, with the first changes coming in SMAPI 3.14.0.

The new content API is feature-complete in the upcoming SMAPI 3.14.0. Once that's released, the upcoming Content Patcher 2.0.0 will migrate to the new content API, and then only a...

This is now fixed in the [upcoming Stardew Valley 1.6](https://stardewvalleywiki.com/Modding:Migrate_to_Stardew_Valley_1.6) too, which changes how bundle data is managed so the issue no longer happens.

Ideally SMAPI should use a code-signing certificate that Linux/Mac/Windows will recognise by default, and isn't too expensive. Some options: * [Certum open-source certificates](https://en.sklep.certum.pl/data-safety/code-signing-certificates/open-source-code-signing-929.html) (€28.00/year) * [Comodo certificates via KSoftware](http://codesigning.ksoftware.net/) ($84/year)

I'll go with KSoftware. A quick review of the main candidates per discussion with @vaindil: * [DigiCert](https://www.digicert.com/code-signing/) is 'as low as' $178/year, which is pretty expensive. They allow unlimited reissues,...

Certificate ordered from KSoftware, pending verification from Comodo.

Thanks for the pull request! I'm open to weak assembly references, but I'm hesitant to do it with this approach. I try to create a [pit of success](https://blog.codinghorror.com/falling-into-the-pit-of-success/) with SMAPI's...