Moshe Atlow

> Are there any volunteers? I'd happily give it a try > We should remember to ping nodemon maintainers before hand. Who needs to be pinged? What message should be...

@remy I tried contacting you via email without any success, trying here: we are considering adding watch (/nodmon like) capabilities into node core and would love to hear some feedback...

I took a look at some existing solutions, including `nodemon`, `node-dev` and `deno --watch`, my conclusion is avoiding child processes will provide a nicer/smoother DX, I think the best way...

@addaleax @jasnell I was told you might know who can help

> Could you elaborate on that point? 1. my assumption, (it might be wrong) is that using sub-processes has a bigger performance penalty than using a thread for handling file...

This can be achieved with https://www.npmjs.com/package/c8 Not sure if censoring this would be the right thing

I don't think the node core documentation should include links to userland packages - for various reasons, but mainly there are a lot of opinions and ways to do things...

CC @nodejs/assert

CC @nodejs/assert @nodejs/test_runner I believe that there adding some minimalistic pieces into core can make testing with zero dependencies a common practice, this was also [raised](https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/40954) in the original issue...

another example of an (internal) implentation for this: https://github.com/nodejs/node-core-test/blob/main/test/message.js, besides `tests/message`