Mike Thompson

Hi @vinomutty, we haven't heard from you in more than a month. Have the above suggestions resolved your issue?

> i am using synopsys tool (VCS simulator) and tried to run corev-dv testcases in cv32e40p. Are you working on the `cv32e40p/dev` branch? This is _very_ important. > other than...

Please see my comment above: > Make sure you are using the cv32e40p/dev branch of the core-v-verif repo. This is very important. Try `git clone -b cv32e40p/dev ....`

Moving status to "Not Started" as there is no indication that anything was done on this task.

Removing original assignee as they are no longer assigned to this project.

Hi @davideschiavone. As far as I am aware, the "core complex" concept has been deferred indefinitely. I recommend that we close this Issue and remove it from the Project Board.

Hi @davideschiavone. One the CVE2 project (Kanban) board, the status of this task is "pull-request submitted". I do not see this PR, so I am moving this task back to...

Update: @cairo-caplan updated the environment and generated [MikeOpenHWGroup cv32e20-dv Pull-Request #2](https://github.com/MikeOpenHWGroup/cv32e20-dv/pull/2), which has been successfully merged in. I can confirm that the RVFI logfile (uvm_test_top.env.rvfi_agent.trn.log) is written out and that...

Good point @silabs-robin! The same could be said for `vendor_lib`. I will work with @MarioOpenHWGroup to create a couple of helpful (?) READMEs for these directories.

@ASintzoff said: > Instead of having sub-projects, I would prefer to have verification inside the CVA6 project as we have done until now. This will reduce the risk of redundant...