Dominic Clark
Dominic Clark
> I thought about that and to me It looked out of place. Automation and undo history are some of the uglier bits of LMMS, so where the two intersect,...
See also #5201 and #5561.
I agree with PhysSong's earlier comment. > Given the functional nature of signals and slots, I think what I have now is a really neat functional solution. While I agree...
We discussed the desired approach to `.gitignore` a while back, and concluded that each user should put their own IDE files and folders in `.git/info/exclude` locally. I'll try to find...
The discussion I was thinking of was #5062. The vote was 7-1 in favour of users ignoring their IDE files locally. Restricting to users who appear on [the contributor list](https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/graphs/contributor),...
> Yes but... we can add comments to any line or section we want. The original author of an ignore pattern being gone doesn't guarantee that no-one else is using...
I like this idea. Instruments already work this way - you drag and drop them into the song editor - but effects are added through a dialog. It would be...
Possibly related to #5122. @herodotas Can you provide a simple project that exhibits this issue?
Thanks - I've reproduced the bug. I don't think it's quite the same as #5122, but I would guess it's something similar with MIDI message timing/ordering. I'll investigate. You can...
This is intended behaviour: computers have a limit to their processing power, so once enough notes are played, LMMS can no longer generate audio fast enough to play it back...