Elias Rohrer
Elias Rohrer
> What do you think about that? Sounds good to me, although we might need to account for the fact that the two variants have slightly different type requirements (i.e.,...
Did another round of review, will take another look once CI passes.
@Anyitechs let us know when you rebased and this is ready for another (hopefully final) look!
Just want to node that it was discussed in yesterday's spec call that as part of this work we'll probably also want to make `option_simple_close` transactions (optionally) v3, i.e., require...
Btw, likely unrelated, but we didn't release Swift bindings for LDK Node 0.4.1 only then for the newest 0.4.2.
> Good additional note on reproducing the issue that was reported by a user, Swift bindings for LDK Node 0.4.1 are actually just 0.4.0 Yes, as said above, we didn't...
I generally like QUIC, appreciate it's benefits, and even explored its potential usefulness for Bitcoin's P2P layer at some point. Stream isolation would be nice to have, but other than...
We briefly mentioned this on the recent call, but I'd like to raise the question again whether it would make sense to have multiple (dedicated) TCP connections to isolate streams...
> That the CPFP carve out policy is the only reason Bob can CPFP Mallory's mutual close and get some of his funds back. I guess if we agree with...
> Indeed, there's not much reason to change it now for the existing channels, but for TRUC channels we definitely want to have v3 close txn. IMO we should do...