zzak
zzak
I don't think this has anything special to do with your associations, but modifying the `key` directly like this is not supported. The key is a secure token designed to...
Vipul said he would look into updating his PR soon, let's give him a chance to pick up where he left off 🙏
@aka47 Thanks for your hard work! Would you please add a changelog and squash your commits? :bow:
@aka47 Should be fixed now if you want to rebase :pray:
If it's an open bug, and someone on the team has confirmed we might add `pinned` label to keep it from being auto-closed, or if there is a PR the...
@yahonda I'm on the fence about removing the test, because for historical purposes (i.e. stable branches) it's value is that: * Given an ActiveJob object is enqueued, the class of...
Closing in favor of #55568
So I think what we want is something like the inverse of `class_collisions`: https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/e71a6d410e57589fc9e4b13c918eed427c936152/railties/lib/rails/generators/base.rb#L262-L284 Where we raise if the (model in this case) doesn't exist. This could be useful in...
@AlexisChavez97 Sorry if I sent you on a wild :goose: chase, I had assumed because `check_collision` has some heuristic to determine which constants are already defined, we could do the...
@AlexisChavez97 I figured it out, we can use the isolated test pattern and pull in the `rails` command for an integration style test. I've made a branch here with the...