tgreenx
tgreenx
> PS2: A more elegant solution to this PR would require more change in Zonemaster-LDNS. See https://github.com/zonemaster/zonemaster-ldns/issues/196. I've proposed https://github.com/zonemaster/zonemaster-ldns/pull/203, which would allow for making a more straightforward solution for...
> I've proposed [zonemaster/zonemaster-ldns#203](https://github.com/zonemaster/zonemaster-ldns/pull/203), which would allow for making a more straightforward solution for this PR. So I'm switching it to a draft state for now. @mattias-p @matsduf @MichaelTimbert @marc-vanderwal...
@matsduf please re-review
See also https://github.com/zonemaster/zonemaster-engine/issues/1016
Solved by #1179 (release v2024.2)
@samisalmensuo v2025.1 has been released, please provide a PR with updated translations if possible. Many thanks!
@huguei v2025.1 has been released, please provide a PR with updated translations if possible. Many thanks!
> Could we also have a count of the number of queries answered? (Or conversely, the number of “lost” packets?) We could, but not with the current implementation of `Zonemaster::Engine::Nameserver`.
@mattias-p @marc-vanderwal Sorry, I've further extended this PR with some new changes, could you make a fresh new review ? Thanks.
@mattias-p @matsduf I should have addressed most comments, and I've also made small refactoring/improvements, see https://github.com/zonemaster/zonemaster-cli/pull/421/commits/b0c1bf2540dc2be2cee08e9cbc73c2d339f9b237. Please re-review. And regarding the use cases, as Mattias pointed out, the purpose of...