Shane Utt

Readability is subjective: I'm more interested in the prescriptiveness it would bring: setting a clear standard in tests that use testify for how to achieve this and leaving less room...

> Maybe it should take two durations, a `tick` and a `testFor`, a bit like `Eventually` does? Right, in the original post I had mocked it up that way but...

> Maybe, specifying a total duration and a number of successful executions feel a little over-constrained though? You can define a Consistently call which can never pass. It might just...

/ok-to-test

Despite this issue being quite old, we the maintainers are still pretty convinced that we want to have this functionality in a future release. We are marking this `help wanted`...

Despite this issue being quite old, we the maintainers are still pretty convinced that we want to have this functionality in a future release. We are marking this `help wanted`...

Despite this issue being quite old, we the maintainers are still pretty convinced that we want to have this functionality in a future release. We are marking this `help wanted`...

Despite this issue being quite old, we the maintainers are still pretty convinced that we want to have this functionality in a future release. We are marking this `help wanted`...

I'm on board with a `v0.5.1` for the recent conformance test fixes :+1: An argument may be made about not doing this in a patch release and if we were...

I've created `release-0.5` (analogous to `release-0.4`) :+1: And yes, feel free to create an issue for creating backport procedure and documentation.