Reece Hart

@jfreidin : Apologies, I missed this question way back then. There are two things going on here. 1) Yes, NM_006060.6 suffers from this issue. Specifically, the transcript alignment doesn't start...

## Description of problem UTA assumes that transcripts align to genomic references exon-wise and in toto. Although this assumption is good for the vast majority of transcripts (works on >99.5%...

Yes, I mean "partial alignments". That is, the partial property is of the alignment, not of the transcript itself. By "partial transcripts", I think you're referring to accessioned transcripts that...

This is a really screwy case that illustrates why we could make UTA precisely wrong by using 37. First, here's what's available from NCBI: | | NM_006060.5 | NM_006060.6 |...

After 2 breaks and several national holidays, I finally worked my way through Bob's comment. :-) Let's please drop discussion of imaginary sequences. It's incidental to the model. I will...

Glad you raised this. How do you imagine that this would be used in practice? Would you report variation in the shifted or unshifted coordinates? Is the shifting a property...

_Original comment on Bitbucket by_ **Reece Hart (Bitbucket: [reece](http://bitbucket.org/reece), GitHub: [reece](http://github.com/reece))**: --- ... and, this should include completely overhauling testing

Rescheduling for 1.3.

First, I'm impressed that you dove this far into UTA internals! I don't know the story for this transcript specifically, and these data are 4-6 years old, perhaps from the...

uta_20190926 currently has an issue (#228) that prevents us from building a docker images. A change was made to materialize a very large view, and it takes >12 hours (when...