Jarek Potiuk
Jarek Potiuk
cc: @ferruzzi @Bowrna -> I remember there were discussions about it in the past . Did we decide to leave it in s for back-compatibility ?
Hey @vandonr - since you are the original author of #30612 and likely will be easier to get all the context back - maybe you can comment on that one?...
Sounds like a breaking bug-fix to me . I.e. yes - we know it will be breaking, but it was broken in the first place anyway. @ferruzzi - WDYT? I'd...
> It looks like consensus is that we don't have to deal with deprecation, so that's great. Agree.
> Magic methods already have defined semantics and documenting them is entirely missing the point. If a tool requires you to do it, it is not a good tool. Yep....
As discussed in https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38452 - we remove the D105 rule from our checks.
> I'm happy to share the source code (with parts taken out). That's what replica means.
Not sure why you are calling me - I have nothing to do with UI. please try to not call people directly if you are not sure if you should...
Just one static check to fix
Usually we expect unit tests modified whenever any new functionality is added. Can you add one please? It seems imap has quite comprehensive set of tests and it should be...