Jarek Potiuk
Jarek Potiuk
cc: @ferruzzi @vincbeck might be worth looking at
Fixed by #39103
> @jedcunningham that's because xmlsec project [uploaded binary wheels](https://pypi.org/project/xmlsec/1.3.14/#files) for 1.3.14 (see recent comments in [xmlsec/python-xmlsec#316](https://github.com/xmlsec/python-xmlsec/issues/316)) so perhaps the pin inside airflow should be removed now, since they are expected...
> Is it reproduced in latest Airflow (2.9.0 at that moment)? I do not think there was a change in this area since. But it looks plausible and likely not...
Just a kind reminder that proposal to add a new provider should be announced with justification - why you think the provider cannot be released and maintained outside of the...
Why not just adding it to `microsoft.azure` then? Adding new provider to manage, is quite an overhead (and to remind again - it would require devlist discussion). Adding just an...
In order for that change would be considered for merging - it needs to have more explanation, documentation, configuration parameter added and described in the templates and unit tests.
Could you please check and dump the state of your shared volume with logs when it happens (including information abtout the symbolic link that is failing, permissions, ownership? Seems that...
@dstandish - I am currently at PyCon US, and I have a busy plan of attending talks and meeting people here :) - > I plan to take a very...
> In my opinion, the main problem with having templates being rendered in this case is that now we need to sanitize user data when processing it in expanded tasks...