Nigel Megitt

@michaelchampion re https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/522#issuecomment-1050236655 : I'm struck that you're on the one hand saying that there is no Director, and on the other apparently dismissing the idea that technologies such as...

Aside: devices that consume TTML from URLs Just to name a few: * All HbbTV 2.0 connected TV devices/set top boxes provided with an appropriate MPEG DASH MPD * All...

This thread isn't about the TTWG Charter specifically, though it does provide a useful example at the moment. Comments about that are welcome of course, in the appropriate place (i.e....

@dwsinger then the choice you are giving external organisations is that they can take the risk on themselves, and sometimes that results in unwanted additional cost, or broken functionality that...

@dwsinger ah, I did not mean that the risk is in changing the label, rather the risk is in encouraging, by acceptance, specifications to linger in CR semi-permanently. This seemed...

@dwsinger great, we're in agreement about that. The only question then is what to do when a spec has been in CR for so long that forwards-facing CR exit, in...

+1 to keeping the requirement that prevents small groups from organising an "official" event of some kind with inadequate notice for general attendance, and also +1 to stripping out unnecessary...

> guideline/best practice / general expectation If we were in the unfortunate situation of a small group trying to pressgang others into something without adequate notice or review period, by...

@wseltzer that's a really good general rule. From the tone of the issue text I sense that there is a lingering question: "who is a party?"

Seems like a sensible area to look at. I believe W3C has an agreement with ISO/IEC about the standing of Recs as international standards. We should check that changing or...