Nigel Megitt

The way you've described this, @plehegar , the Membership Agreement _includes_ the Process, so it's impossible for the Process to conflict with the Membership Agreement. I think you're wanting to...

@wseltzer I find that wording begs a further question: over what does the Patent Policy take precedence? It could be read as either taking precedence over the Process or _everything_...

Here's an alternative for consideration: Rather than ruling on specific FOs, the ODC could instead rule on the relative merit of the rationales of competing FOs. Taking a step back,...

Agreed @dwsinger and that's a good reason for not giving the CEO the opportunity to choose. If the FO is not well founded, then fine, things will be reverted naturally,...

@dwsinger What if the very reason for the CEO choosing someone unacceptable has the same cause as the objection being dealt with?

Speaking as a Chair, not as a member representative, +1 to @frivoal on this: too many times I've been in discussions where a WG member has leapt from to "formal...

> FWIW, I've never encountered a use of "living standards" meant to have that meaning before this issue. @TallTed the request here is not for individual anecdotes, but for some...

@frivoal that could work; 2 thoughts: 1. _Breadth of application_: To the extent that jargon words are included in the Process, this is a Process issue, but I agree that...

As per https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/574#issuecomment-925006702 I think this change is misplaced and belongs in the referencing document, i.e. the Member Agreement, not the Process.

> @nigelmegitt I think this could go in either the Member Agreement or the Process, and it's a lot easier to put it in the Process, so I think it's...