Nigel Megitt

> I doubt that we are going to completely disambiguate the meanings of: > > * independent #167

@dwsinger I certainly do not think "independent" is obvious. My [comment](https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/628#issuecomment-1259218186) was a link to the issue when I first pointed this out and asked for clarification, more than 4...

> If they have internal disagreement, they should share that, too. This is important and often missed, I think. The default response when there is a range of incompatible views...

I don't understand what problem this is addressing: it seems premature to have an open pull request for this, and I will comment this on #660. This issue is raised...

@kostalski-bs this is very concerning re imscJS - would you be able to open a separate issue and include any examples of TTML styles applied into HTML in such a...

@mlasak There is no IMSC 1.1.1 - the currently active IMSC versions are 1.0.1, 1.1 and 1.2. Each in turn adds features to the previous, but there are no breaking...

I also have found the timings confusing in this case. An analogy would be my PVR, which allows me to record something and play it back simultaneously, and during playback...

Please could you highlight the problematic wording? I cannot see any text that _prevents_ WGs or Members from requesting that the Team begins arranging a liaison. I agree that the...

I like the approach here, but I think merely having a standing invitation to TAG meetings is slightly too weak, in the sense that it needs to be clear that...

I think this sort of change warrants an issue before opening the PR, so that we can come to consensus around the problem and the shape of the solution. I...