Nigel Megitt

Both Wide Review and Horizontal Review are defined, and HR is a subset of WR. I agree that during eg WG conversations about the two it is common for the...

> an explicit opportunity and request for consortium review (membership, team and IEs) Do we request consortium review? I know we explicitly request review from W3C groups that are listed...

Right - the Process requires Wide Review for _entering_ CR, but that definitely does not require AC review.

I can confirm that this is frustrating! I think the level of expectation escalates along the scale: * Member of the public * Affiliate with a W3C Member organisation *...

To add to @marcoscaceres point above, in the specific case that the objector specifies a proposed resolution, which is then accepted without modification, and then is unresponsive to requests to...

[Latest imscJS release](https://github.com/sandflow/imscJS/releases/latest) is 1.1.3 currently.

I'd suggest a mechanism for doing this would be to construct a data url from the dereferenced image resource, since the text of the data url can be compared directly,...

Sorry to raise hopes - I will not be implementing it for the foreseeable future.

I think there's a framing problem here. Especially when it comes to WGs, Decisions are made when the Chair asserts that the group has consensus to adopt a Proposal. When...

> > We need to be able to distinguish the scenarios: > > > > 1. A Proposal was assessed and rejected, so the group chose no Decision. > >...