Greg Oledzki
Greg Oledzki
I think it's a good call to attract young blood! I am happy to be part of the team which takes over. I hope it grows beyond a single-person team,...
Not thinking about it too much, but I guess it's more about the super class being abstract, not that the return type is `Unit`.
Indeed, the checks we have there are based on textual rendering of some `toStrings`: https://github.com/sksamuel/scapegoat/blob/5750a81181cfc405914a334e86af87e1577deac0/src/main/scala/com/sksamuel/scapegoat/inspections/inference/PointlessTypeBounds.scala#L27
I think that reproduces the same issue: ``` class Test[T
I haven't had a chance to work with Scala 3 / Dotty before. Not sure what it takes and how are we from having scapegoat support that language.
Interesting. So is the plan to have a new project / fork, or will it possible to merge and maintain one code base?
So based on the information above. The title doesn't do it justice as to work needed: > Please compile support for Scala 3.0.0 suggests it's about compiling/building/releasing a version. While...
No. I don't think so. At least I am not aware
You are right. My point is that the notion of disabling the inspection could be replaced with a new level. This way we wouldn't need to develop and maintain two...
Let's establish what's the truth first. And then I suggest we can adjust the message to reflect that. I am checking for Scala 2.12.11. If I am reading the code...