Greg Oledzki
Greg Oledzki
Should this be labeled as uses-data-flow?
I think it's an interesting idea. And we end up having natural three levels: - easy (hints allowed) - normal (hints allowed, but with penalty) - hard (no hints allowed)...
... or correct it automatically behind the scenes.
Interesting. I am wondering what makes `Cons` special here: https://github.com/scapegoat-scala/scapegoat/blob/6b6f4e2466d1f44d741b90a4616ae33969242ef9/src/main/scala/com/sksamuel/scapegoat/inspections/option/OptionGet.scala#L28
No immediate idea. One has to debug.
Tagging @saeltz for awareness
I have no idea either. But Googling led me to this: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/31851733/scala-compiliation-error-with-intellij After reading that, I'd try running this all outside of IntelliJ - where your control of the execution...
https://github.com/sbt/sbt-pgp/issues/182#issuecomment-727572511 hints that this is a Sonatype credential issue. Which reminds me of my recent problems with releasing an unrelated Maven/Java package. And there it turned out I should no...
An alternative would probably be to set up a new Sonatype/Maven identity - i.e. new artifacts group/id and discontinue the `sksamuel` branding. But I wouldn't want to do that without...
Related to #701 ?